Sign in to see the current vote count, add your own vote, or leave a comment.
I'm hoping we'll eventually be able to run more detailed licensing reports through the admin center. It would be extremely helpful to have data on when licenses are assigned/removed from users and by whom to make sure that processes are being followed and pinpoint changes/errors.
I completely agree with this. We are seeing strange behavior with license assignments and don't have access to the data that would provide clarity on who assigned/removed a license and when. I would also add that being able to see when system admin entitlement has been granted or removed and by who is also much needed.
I agree with this request as well. This would be beneficial to see when license were granted and/or removed. We had an issue where a user changed named and it appeared it revoked the licensed somehow when it wasn't manually removed by any existing System Admin user. Getting insight on either an individual user or API process would give us more visibility to track down when permissions like this changes.
I have a workflow with nearly 40 automations, half of which are email-based requests for updates with various sets of triggers. While I know the automations work, due to months of testing, when our system went live to the institution, I became very worried that the automations wouldn't run and I'd have no idea whether or…
Hi, I am part of a very large organization where hundreds will have Admin access to hundreds of Workspaces in order for them to contribute and make full use of Smartsheet features. Currently All Smartsheet workspace Admins receive Workspace access email alerts. Which means hundreds of team members will effectively be…
It would be useful if users who clicked a Dynamic View link (that they were not previously added to) could "request access" to the Dynamic View, and provide a reason, so that the admin can easily grant that access. The use case for me would be to avoid having to pre-populate and then maintain a user group of viewers, but…