Hi,
In the spirit of efficiency of memory usage, I want to figure out which methodology would be better:
In either case, A/B are columns used to toggle several sheet functions as they relate to the heirarchy level the row is.
- Use a nested IF statement: =IF(A@row = 0, SUM(CHILDREN()), IF(B@row=0, INDEX({REF Share}, MATCH([Applicant Name]@row, {Applicant Name}, 1))))
- Use alternating IF statements assigned to the parent and child row types:
=IF(A@row = 0, SUM(CHILDREN()))
=IF(B@row=0, INDEX({REF Share}, MATCH([Applicant Name]@row, {Applicant Name}, 1))))
Will one of these be significantly better on memory usage than the other in a large, dynamic dataset? I expect the sheet to grow to potentially max out the sheet and spill over into an additional sheet.
Does anyone foresee issues arising in either case?
Additionally, I intend to have my team populate rows via forms so that formulas remain untouched.