I work in higher ed, and my team uses the proofing widget often, and we've had a relatively successful process in place for reviewing designed content (like flyers, brochures, postcards, etc), but we're realizing a few things:
- Often times we are going beyond our "sweet spot" of a max of 4 versions of a proof and things get out of hand and we get off deadline.
- We need to identify a tiered review process so everyone knows when "they're up" to review or the project lead needs to know at which point to pull in certain stakeholders.
- When the request is something we've designed in the past, and is coming down the pipeline for a refresh the following year, we're running into some review process issues where the marketing team should be taking an initial look at the piece and identifying edits needed, uploading a refreshed version before we send to the stakeholder to react/add additional edits.
- This is not always happening, and there ends up being too many "cooks in the kitchen" giving feedback and then we start going in circles.
- We need to identify a different (but also tiered) review process for videos.
Have you established a tiered proof review process that still allows for versions to remain at a minimum (so as to not get out of hand and deadlines can remain on track) but there is a clearly identified road map for who should be reviewing 1st, 2nd, and so forth?